OPINION – Criticisms of Tim Walz’s response to the 2020 BLM protests

Kamala Harris has chosen Tim Walz as her Vice Presidential running mate for the 2024 election, several criticisms of his response to the 2020 Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests could be relevant in evaluating his candidacy:

Initial Response and Leadership Concerns
Governor Tim Walz’s handling of the 2020 BLM protests faced significant criticism for perceived indecisiveness and weakness. Critics argue that his initial response was too slow and lacked the necessary assertiveness to prevent the escalation of violence and property damage. This perception of a weak leadership response, especially during such a critical time, raises concerns about his ability to manage high-pressure situations effectively on a national scale.

Delay in National Guard Activation
One of the most pointed criticisms was the delay in deploying the Minnesota National Guard. Critics argue that this delay allowed the situation to spiral further out of control, with increased damage and disorder before adequate military support was mobilized. This aspect of his response is particularly concerning when considering his role as Vice President, where prompt and decisive action is crucial in times of national crisis.

Law Enforcement Strategy and Coordination
The coordination and strategy of law enforcement under Walz’s leadership during the unrest were also criticized. Reports of abandoned police precincts and inadequate protection of businesses point to a failure in managing the crisis effectively. For a Vice Presidential candidate, this raises questions about his ability to ensure robust and cohesive responses to complex issues, which is essential for national security and public safety.

Communication and Public Messaging
Walz’s communication throughout the protests has been scrutinized for not providing strong enough reassurances or clarity. Critics argue that his focus on long-term issues like racial justice, while important, may have overshadowed the immediate need for restoring order. Effective public messaging is a key attribute for any Vice President, who must be able to communicate clearly and decisively in a variety of situations.

Perception of Weakness
Overall, these criticisms contribute to a broader perception of weakness in Walz’s leadership during the protests. For Kamala Harris’s 2024 campaign, the concern is that such a record might affect public confidence in Walz’s ability to handle national crises and exert strong leadership. As Vice President, he would need to demonstrate resilience and effective decision-making, qualities that critics argue were not fully evident in his past responses.

In conclusion, while Tim Walz brings a wealth of experience to the table, these criticisms of his leadership during a pivotal moment could impact public perception as he assumes the role of Vice Presidential candidate. Kamala Harris’s choice reflects a broader assessment of his capabilities and how they align with the demands of the Vice Presidency.